PI3K inhibition restores and amplifies response to ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis

TK Moyo, A Kishtagari, MT Villaume, B McMahon… - Clinical Cancer …, 2023 - AACR
TK Moyo, A Kishtagari, MT Villaume, B McMahon, SR Mohan, T Stopczynski, SC Chen
Clinical Cancer Research, 2023AACR
Purpose: Treatment options are limited beyond JAK inhibitors for patients with primary
myelofibrosis (MF) or secondary MF. Preclinical studies have revealed that PI3Kδ inhibition
cooperates with ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, to reduce proliferation and induce apoptosis
of JAK2 V617F-mutant cell lines. Patients and Methods: In a phase I dose-escalation and-
expansion study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a selective PI3Kδ inhibitor,
umbralisib, in combination with ruxolitinib in patients with MF who had a suboptimal …
Purpose
Treatment options are limited beyond JAK inhibitors for patients with primary myelofibrosis (MF) or secondary MF. Preclinical studies have revealed that PI3Kδ inhibition cooperates with ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, to reduce proliferation and induce apoptosis of JAK2V617F-mutant cell lines.
Patients and Methods
In a phase I dose-escalation and -expansion study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, umbralisib, in combination with ruxolitinib in patients with MF who had a suboptimal response or lost response to ruxolitinib. Enrolled subjects were required to be on a stable dose of ruxolitinib for ≥8 weeks and continue that MTD at study enrollment. The recommended dose of umbralisib in combination with ruxolitinib was determined using a modified 3+3 dose-escalation design. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy outcomes were evaluated, and spleen size was measured with a novel automated digital atlas.
Results
Thirty-seven patients with MF (median age, 67 years) with prior exposure to ruxolitinib were enrolled. A total of 2 patients treated with 800 mg umbralisib experienced reversible grade 3 asymptomatic pancreatic enzyme elevation, but no dose-limiting toxicities were seen at lower umbralisib doses. Two patients (5%) achieved a durable complete response, and 12 patients (32%) met the International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment response criteria of clinical improvement. With a median follow-up of 50.3 months for censored patients, overall survival was greater than 70% after 3 years of follow-up.
Conclusions
Adding umbralisib to ruxolitinib in patients was well tolerated and may resensitize patients with MF to ruxolitinib without unacceptable rates of adverse events seen with earlier generation PI3Kδ inhibitors. Randomized trials testing umbralisib in the treatment of MF should be pursued.
AACR